Sooner or later on your journey down the rabbit hole you’re quite likely to end up finding the Pale beyond which you will not go: the ‘conspiracy theory’ so utterly absurd, so fantastically implausible that you refuse to entertain it even for one second.
For some it’s Flat Earth, for others it’s the outrageous notion that those four, lovable and super-talented mop tops from Liverpool were manufactured - just like the Rolling Stones - by a sinister institute called Tavistock. And for others, I was surprised to learn from the outrage on my Telegram channel recently, it’s the theory that drinking your own urine might have health benefits.
But for many more, I suspect, it will be Elite Gender Inversion. This is the theory that more than a few of the famous people whom you think of as women are in fact blokes. And vice versa.
I spent a whole afternoon exploring this rabbit hole once and you end up in some pretty strange places. One site I visited even went half way to persuading me that Jimmy Page and even more so Robert Plant had definitely been born female, which I have difficulty believing, because, for example, how many girl rock stars do you know who are that good on guitar? But I refuse altogether to rule out the possibility for reasons I have outlined in various other essays on this subject.
There are few things more annoying - or nakedly hypocritical - than purportedly Awake people who appoint themselves gatekeepers on which conspiracy theories you are allowed to trust and which are totally off limits.
A better reason for avoiding Elite Gender Inversion (EGI) theory is that it can get you killed. This supposedly was the fate of comedienne Joan Rivers after she stated on camera in 2014: “Michelle Obama is a Transgender, we ALL know.” Rivers died a few months later, allegedly from complications during surgery.
The first time I encountered this particular ‘conspiracy theory’ I remember thinking all the usual thoughts: “But why?”, “How could They possibly carry this off because it’s not as though she’s not in the public eye ALL the time?”, and so on.
Then I watched the video for the funny and very catchy song by Okay Boomer - “Michelle Obama is a man. Oh yeah. Her real name is Michael. She’s a trans, oh yeah. I would have thought you noticed the dick in her pants…” - and I began to have second thoughts.
Sure you could argue that all that footage of Michelle’s flapping wedding tackle had been mischievously edited in by unscrupulous pranksters. But it’s not just the lunchbox, is it? It’s the size of the hands, the heft of those biceps and American Footballer shoulders. That and those awkward early photos from when hetero Barack appeared to be very attached to a man, looking just like Michelle, only bearing the name Michael LaVaughn Robinson.
Once you’ve seen it you can’t unsee it. In fact, it starts to look so blatantly obvious you begin to wonder - just like Okay Boomer in that song - how anyone could possibly have been taken in.
I have a theory on this, largely inspired by the heroic research of my most recent podcast [available to subscribers now and for everyone else in a week or so] guest Mr E. Mr E - his real name is Mark and no, he’s not, contrary to internet rumour the lead singer of the band Eels pretending to be an online conspiracy theorist - and he was once, just like me (and you too probably) a confirmed Elite Gender Inversion sceptic.
What he found, however, on delving deeper into the phenomenon is that famous women that aren’t women like Michelle Obama are closer to being the rule than they are the exception.
That is, whether we’re talking about Hollywood actresses or ballsy female pop stars or First Ladies or women athletes, many of the amazing women we are encouraged to admire, even idolise, are actually men in drag.
Sometimes it’s so blatant they barely bother even hiding it. Look at the early interviews of Hollywood sex symbol Sandra Bullock, for example, and it’s obviously a bloke in semi-disguise, the Adam’s apple being one dead giveaway. Often the clue - as with Bullock: a castrated male bovine - is in the name. Either it’s a Christian name that sounds like a man’s - Taylor Swift; Billie Holliday - or it’s some kind of excruciating pun, like Tina Turner.
As so often in this world of occult symbolism, They don’t want you to know but simultaneously They do want you to know just enough to realise that They are mocking you. Victoria’s Secret is another classic example of this. I remember as a younger man lusting after all those luscious female models and wondering what the ‘Secret’ was that people in the know were all, like, “You don’t KNOW? You really don’t KNOW??’ about. Spoiler alert: they’re not luscious females.
On my podcast with Mr E, we broach the troubling question as to whether or not, at some time in my youth, I might have cracked one off while fantasising over a mental image or possibly even a magazine photo of an iconic female sex symbol who was actually a man.
Chances are, yes. Which of course is what They want. One of the primary goals of all this gender confusion that They are sowing among us is to mess with our heads. Consider the implications. Just about the first thing you learn, even tiny babies are capable of it, is to discern the difference between men and women. What They want to do is muddy the waters so that we can no longer trust our most basic instincts. Also, They want to shift our notions of what is and isn’t sexually attractive to us, and what qualities of beauty, proportion, muscularity we can expect in the ideal male and female physique.
The social damage caused by all this messing is colossal. It has ruined women’s sport (at least for those few remaining participants who were born women). It has created a generation unable to make zer mind whether they/them/their/wotever are male, female or something in between. It has caused pubescent girls to lop off their breasts and both sexes to be confused into getting hormone treatment. It has led the rise of the incel (involuntarily celibate men). It has poisoned normal relations between men and women. It has affected the reproduction rate.
Perhaps the most widespread of the damage it has done is to the male and female psyche. For several generations, now, women have been misled by the fashion industry, by movies and TV, by adverts into trying to embody a vision of female perfection which they can never achieve - because only men pretending to be women (see: all those models, actresses, whatever) have the right physical make up to get those supposedly desirable skinny bodies. Men, meanwhile, have been taught not to fancy them - or at least not as much as they would have done, because they’ve been gulled into lusting after hot actresses and supermodels who, under their bikinis, are no closer to being real women than Taylor Swift or Michelle ‘Big Mike’ Obama are.
So that goes some way to answering the question “But why would They do it?” They do it for the same reasons They do all the other stuff They do: because they hate us, because they like tormenting us, because it’s a way of confusing us, of manipulating us, and because it’s yet another way to discourage us from reproducing.
But there’s another reason too and this is maybe the most important one of all: because it’s part of Their religion.
This is why I keep saying that if you don’t understand the spiritual dimension of what’s happening in the world right now (and has been since forever) then you cannot call yourself truly Awake. I say this not because I’m a Christian (as is, not so surprisingly, Mr E) but because until you realise that everything goes back to age old struggle between the God of the Bible and the Fallen Angels who inspired the Babylonian Mystery Religions you’ll be missing the intellectual, philosophical and religious framework that makes it all make sense.
All these Hollywood stars pretending to be the opposite sex - and raising their girl children as boys and their boy children as girls; all those US presidents like Obama (and, according to Mr E, every other male president from George Washington onwards - and including Trump) who marry men in drag; they don’t do this crazy stuff just for the shits and giggles, you realise. They do it for the same reasons Christians take communion and try to be more like Christ: because their religion demands it. The Babylonian Mystery Religions - which embrace Satanism, Luciferianism, the occultism of freemasonry, the Kabbala of Talmudic Judaism, etc - put a high premium on androgyny, on the two sexes becoming one, as embodied by male/female gods such as Baphomet. And the reason they do so is because it’s an abomination - an affront to God, a mockery of His creation, and yet another part of this deluded fantasy they have that somehow they can supplant Him by making a new world of their own devising on earth.
Does your head in, doesn’t it, when you realise how deeply embedded all this rank deception and flagrant evil is? I can see why even lots of Awake people don’t want to go there. Especially after you’ve told them about Jo Rogan…
James talks to Jane from the excellent ‘Good Food Project’.
↓ ↓ ↓
The Good Food Project would like to offer Delingpod listeners a 10% discount off their first order with them (including free delivery for orders over £50). This will be applied by adding DELINGPOLE10 at checkout.
http://www.goodfoodproject.co.uk/
They would also like to offer your subscribers a special discount off the virtual tickets for the event we are hosting with Barbara O Neill in Crieff next week. The promo code is: delingpole10
This virtual ticket allows you to watch any session live – there are 4 x 1hour sessions on each of the four days and the full agenda is here
https://goodfoodproject.zohobackstage.eu/BarbaraONeillHealthSummit#/agenda?day=1&lang=en
After the event you will be sent a link with access to all 16 of Barbara’s sessions and the other speakers to download and keep.
The discount ...
James catches up with old friend and ‘Osteo’, Michelle Davies.
www.themichelledavies.com
www.worcester-osteo.com
↓ ↓ ↓
Buy James a Coffee at: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jamesdelingpole
The official website of James Delingpole: https://jamesdelingpole.co.uk
x
Delingpod LIVE: 15th November 2023, Manchester
Finally, in lavish technicolour, the confrontation you've all been waiting for: Delingpole v Icke. It wasn't meant to be this way. The plan was for it to be an entertaining conversation between two truthers about their respective journeys down the rabbit hole. But something went badly wrong. Listen in to decide for yourself what the problem was - and whether you're now Team Delingpole or Team Icke...Very kindly sponsored by Hunter & Gather:https://hunterandgatherfoods.com
↓ ↓ ↓
If you need silver and gold bullion - and who wouldn't in these dark times? - then the place to go is The Pure Gold Company. Either they can deliver worldwide to your door - or store it for you in vaults in London and Zurich. You even use it for your pension. Cash out of gold whenever you like: liquidate within 24 hours.
/ / / / / /
Earn interest on Gold:https://monetary-metals.com/delingpole/
/ / / / / /
If you need silver and gold bullion - and who wouldn't in these ...
If ever you’ve fallen victim to a conman’s trickery - as I have on several expensive occasions - one vital lesson you will have learned is the importance of never investing emotionally in the string of plausible lies you are told.
But while this is easy in theory it is very hard to observe in practice. Most of us are trustworthy, decent people who naturally assume good faith in others. This virtue - and it is a virtue, for who wants to live in a world where we treat everyone we meet as a potential deceiver? - makes us ripe for exploitation by the forces of darkness, especially by their leader the Prince of Lies.
That’s why the Bible enjoins us “Put not your trust in princes” and ‘It is better to trust in the Lord than to put any confidence in man.” Even if you’re not a Christian, you will I hope agree that the principle is sound. If I had to recommend the Bible to atheists it would be as an instruction manual on how to survive in a corrupted world where liars rule the roost.
Anyone who has gone down the rabbit hole ...
Highly recommend this book. It explains the blood of Jesus throughout the whole entire Bible. https://a.co/d/du2YPzV
Global warming is a gigantic conspiracy. Yes, well, dur, obviously we’ve known that for years. I wrote about this myself more than a decade ago in my book Watermelons, which poured scorn on the pitifully scant evidence supportive of the utterly dishonest thesis that global warming is a) man-made b) unprecedented or c) any kind of threat we should take seriously.
What I hadn’t quite appreciated when I wrote the book, though, was the vital role played by the family that did more than anyone to invent, promote, and finance the global warming mega scam: the Rockefellers.
For this discovery, I am indebted to Jacob Nordangård, a Swedish academic (and part time heavy metal vocalist), who first rumbled the Rockefellers when he was still an ardent greenie and doing a research paper on Peak Oil theory. You can hear him tell the story of how he saw the light, and talk about much else besides, on my latest podcast.
Anyway, the Rockefellers. They weren’t even mentioned by name in the first few editions ...
Here is a comment from an earlier piece I wrote expressing scepticism about a widely reported story concerning the alleged slaughter of young Taylor Swift fans in Southport, supposedly by a 17 year old man of Rwandan heritage.
“Whatever fake thing they have cooked up in Southport”….sorry James that is a sick and disgusting comment right now…you have lost a fan
I have no idea whether this fan ‘David’ is who he claims to be. At times like this, any articles questioning the official narrative tend to get swamped with intelligence service bots sowing doubt and division. But let’s give him the benefit of the doubt, assume he is real, and allay his concerns.
David: you really aren’t the only person out there who finds the murder of innocents, children especially, abhorrent, upsetting and senseless. Everybody else does too. Everyone, that is, who is not a psychopath. You are not special. You are not privy to a peculiar degree of empathy and insight in which others, less sensitive, are cruelly deficient. You are just responding in the way that John Donne described when he wrote:
Any man’s death diminisheth me because I am involved with mankind.
The last time I quoted that oft-cited line was at the time of the alleged October 7th massacre in Gaza. [https://delingpole.substack.com/p/israel-and-palestine-this-time-it?utm_source=publication-search]
On that occasion, the story dominating the headlines concerned the murder of dozens of dead babies who - we were told - had had their throats cut by brutal Hamas terrorists.
The story, it subsequently emerged, was a total fabrication - likely by Israel’s next-level propaganda departments keen to whip the world’s media into the desired state of frenzied outrage.
As the Israel newspaper Haaretz - https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-12-05/ty-article-magazine/deepfakes-from-the-gaza-war-increase-fears-about-ais-power-to-mislead/0000018c-3a07-dc03-a9ec-3e7fadf10000 - reported on the use of fake images and videos (by both sides, it claimed) to manipulate people’s emotions:
“The more abhorrent the image, the more likely a user is to remember it and to share it, unwittingly spreading the disinformation further.
‘People are being told right now: look at this picture of a baby’, Ahmed said. ‘The disinformation is designed to make you engage with it.’
I’m sure all the Davids out there - real ones, not just tragically small penised intelligence operatives, too-thick-even-for-cannon-fodder working for 77th Brigade - would have got jolly upset had you tried to explain at the time that they were being played and had fallen for one of the oldest tricks in the book.
But they were and they did. I don’t expect any contrition or self-awareness from these dupes any time soon. After all, they’ll be far too busy getting worked up about the (likely) fake victims of the next big psyop.
As usual - is the girl ever wrong? - the wonderful Miriaf is with me on this. https://open.substack.com/pub/miri/p/the-whole-of-the-moon?r=8sxau&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The first thing we have to acknowledge is that none of us really know for sure what happened. I don't and you don't, but if the event has provoked a strong emotional response in you, then you're even less likely to be able to assess it impartially and accurately.
"What do you mean impartially, you monster! Don't you know that children have just died?!"
No, I don't know that, actually, and nor do you. We only know the media has told us they have.
Did they really die?
Of course it's entirely possible and plausible that they did. Devastatingly, children die every day, and sometimes in horrific, brutal circumstances. This is - obviously - always an unspeakable tragedy for them and their loved ones.
The stark truth is, however, that every time a child meets a violent death - and children who are murdered are most often killed by parents or step-parents - the whole nation isn't up in arms about it.
That's because we don't generally know about it, and we don't generally know about it, because the media doesn't generally tell us, and when it does, it's usually a few short paragraphs on the back pages, not sensationalist front page news everywhere.
Miri’s piece applies, of course, not just to Southport but also to Gaza, the Manchester Arena ‘bombing’ [Do read Iain Davis’s superb coverage of the showtrial of Richard D Hall, the researcher who was all over that nonsense
and indeed to every other incident heavily promoted in the mainstream media in which innocent people (especially if they are children) are murdered or maimed.
Really it should be printed out on a card so that we can carry around in our pockets ready to flash in the face of anyone who looks across at us piteously from their newspaper or TV screen and tries to engage us in the emotional psychodrama of the latest, murdered babies du jour fabrication.
I say ‘fabrication.’ Obviously, as Miriaf - who is much more sensible than me - correctly points out, we cannot be sure in any given instance whether on this occasion real people were killed or not. What we can and should do, though, every time another of these incidents grabs the headlines (and there’s your first clue by the way) is too look out for the ‘tells’.
Among the obvious tells in this Southport story are: the invocation of Taylor Swift (he’s a wrong ‘un, for sure); the bizarre Rwandan connection (ties in with Normies’ idea about where all those machete-wielding immigrants should properly be sent); the deeply unconvincing interviews given by the supposed witnesses and relatives; the suspiciously quickly set up GoFundMe operations (which, as Miriaf correctly observes, are how participants in these alleged psyops are generally rewarded for their duplicity); and the way the event was successfully used by various dubious media players and influencers to persuade a bunch of idiots to attack a mosque (why?), and then, after that, to enable Cabal Manchurian Candidate Keir Starmer to prepare the ground for the closure of ‘far-right’ channels like Telegram.
And lots of you fell for it. Including the woman on my Telegram channel who protested “But they’ve named the children.”
Yes, they always name the children. Remember little Saffie Rose Roussos [note the three names] from the Manchester Arena bombing?
I think Christians getting upset about things like the Last Supper parody is just part of the fake news distraction in the same way Tommy Robinson is or whatever fake thing they’ve cooked up in Southport.
I’m not saying Christians aren’t right to be upset. But what it does is normalise and neutralise the bigger issue by allowing it to be portrayed in the MSM as a kind of “Christians get upset about the kind of thing that Christians would get upset about” story.
The bigger issue, very simply, is the entire Olympics opening ceremony was a Satanic occult ritual. Right there, in your face. As blatant and shameless as the St Gotthard tunnel ceremony. And They don’t even care that we can see it.