James Delingpole
Politics • Culture • Writing
You Really Don't Want To Be Famous
Starring: P Diddy; Fatty Arbuckle; Marlon Brando; Mia Farrow; Tom Hanks; Alan Rickman; and, as the Lovable Illuminati Secret Agent, Leonard Cohen
May 22, 2025
post photo preview

When I was younger, my brother Dick has just reminded me, we went to a psychic fair and had our readings done by some kind of medium.

“Am I going to be famous?” I asked eagerly.

“I wouldn’t wish that on anyone,” the medium replied.

How wise that medium was. But I’m sure at the time that wisdom would have gone right over my head. Fame was the thing I wanted more than anything, even more than money.

“Ah but when you’re famous you get loads of money anyway”, would probably have been my reply to that particular point. “And lots of sex,” I would likely have been thinking also, this being my late adolescence when I thought of little else.

Why am I now so grateful to God that my dream never came true?

Here are a few reasons.

I was never required to marry a man pretending to be a woman nor to have to go to that celebrity hospital they all go to in LA where they pretend to have a baby which they then have to rear as if it is their own - but bring it up transgender, obviously, in homage to Baphomet.

I never had to be gang-raped by P Diddy (or similar) and his chums, then pretend it was completely normal and I hadn’t been affected by this thing I obviously couldn’t talk about.

I never have to remember to flash occult symbols - the all-seeing eye, the concealed hand, 666 etc - whenever I’m being photographed.

I don’t have to torture, rape and murder small children because Satan and his crew of junior evil deities find it pleasing.

I never have to attend award ceremonies.

I never had to participate in a humiliation ritual, like posing on the front of GQ in a dress. [It’s not just movie stars and rock stars who have to do this shit. Even F1 champions are not exempt]

I never have to worry that when I’m bustling about town or I’m out for a nice country walk someone might approach me from the bushes to whisper the trigger word that turns me suddenly into an MK Ultra assassin or means I suddenly shave my head and have to be dragged off to the clinic by my handler where I’m coshed with drugs until my reprogramming is complete.

I never had to sign the deal where in turn for selling your soul for all eternity you get a few years flying around in private jets - being bummed occasionally by P Diddy, obviously, but still - so long as you play your role and keep appearing on stage or screen long after your knackered limbs are begging you to retire.

Obviously, some readers will think that this is just “James being funny” or “James exaggerating.” And I’m happy for people to think that way, if it makes them feel better. But I do hope there’s at least one thing we can all agree on however far down the rabbit hole we might or not be: that becoming ‘famous’ is an experience so seductive in the youthful imagination and so unbearably hideous in reality that it can only be the work of the devil.

I mean this quite literally, of course. You are welcome to conceive of the devil as a figurative character if you prefer. But whether you understand the reality of the supernatural or you’re still hedging your bits the truth remains the same: you don’t get to be famous without selling your soul - and thereafter paying an unimaginably terrible price for it.

If you do agree with me on this, though, I think you’ll find that, even now, even after all we’ve seen - from MeToo to Epstein Island to Diddy , and all the way back to Fatty Arbuckle and beyond - we are still very much in the minority. I’d say most people out there in the world look at the lives of the famous and think: “I wouldn’t mind some of that.” And I’d say that, unfortunately, many young people continue to imagine - as I once did - that if only they could become famous it would solve all their problems.

There are lots of reasons why this is so but most of them can be summed up in one word: brainwashing. Or better still two words: Satanic brainwashing.

From birth we are put under an evil spell. A key part of this spell is relentless propaganda.

Look, if you can bear it, at any ‘serious’ newspaper on a Saturday or Sunday. It will be full of lovingly crafted articles by the best feature writers - I know because I used to be one of them - all of which start from the same basic premise: “This person is worthy of our attention because he or she is famous. Therefore what they say, however stupid, is really interesting. And we’re all kind of lucky to have spent time in their company - you to be reading about them and me to have landed the great gig of seeing them in the flesh.”

Meanwhile the tabloids are doing a similar job of keeping these celebrity creatures in the public eye by writing tittle tattle about their private lives in a way that implies that if you don’t know this stuff you are out of the loop.

And TV is doing the same by feting them on chat shows.

And charities and similar organisations are doing the same by appointing them as representatives or ambassadors.

Ditto all the major fashion labels who give them free clothes.

And the politicians who want to be seen rubbing shoulders with them because it shows they’re in touch with the kind of people the public like.

And the restaurants who put photographs of them on their walls because that will impress customers.

And the publishers who publish their (ghost-written) books.

And so on.

Essentially, it’s hard to go anywhere without getting this message, rammed down your throat, that being famous is where it’s at; and that if you’re not famous you are some kind of lesser being.

That’s why I don’t particularly blame myself for all the years I spent as a journalist bigging up all these tragic creatures, and wanting to rub shoulders with them in the hope that that some of their stardust might sprinkle onto me. It would be like blaming a Korean War prisoner who’d spent years being brainwashed in a Chinese POW camp for not saying anything critical about communism.

But I do find it interesting to analyse why it is that despite all the evidence out there to the contrary - and there’s an awful lot of it - so many of us are still beguiled by the cult of celebrity.

What it comes down to, I think, is the combination of the stories they (the deceivers) tell us - and the stories we tell ourselves as a consequence.

https://jamesdelingpole.locals.com/upost/6925787/jasun-horsley

Let me give you some thoughts arising from my recent podcast with Jasun Horsley who, like me, spent most of his life entranced by the fantasy of what he calls an ‘epic-Hollywood-sponsored life’ and ‘the culturally incepted dream of being a “star”’

He first visited it as a 20-year old, in recent receipt of a large inheritance, and has been infatuated with Hollywood ever since, writing a number of books on films and the movie industry, including 16 Maps of Hell, which I highly recommend.

Its subtitle - The Unraveling of Hollywood Superculture - gives you the gist. He describes the book as ‘a 600-page denunciation of pop culture and mass media as one giant mafia of soul control, heavily regulated by old seers hungry to fill their inner emptiness with endless slices of world domination.’

You don’t need to be a conspiracy theorist to enjoy the book. In fact it probably wouldn’t help if you are because in the chapter called Conspiracy Theory, the author tries rather too hard to keep a foot in the door of Normiedom by bracketing all conspiracy theorists with Alex Jones and David Icke and by pontificating, straw-man-ishly that ‘accurate interpretations of reality that are illegitimately arrived at are worse than worthless.’

[I have a go at him about this in our chat because I think it’s bollocks. You’ll have to listen to the podcast to find out why]

But I think that this is to the book’s advantage. It will help it sell more. Also, if readers think they are reading a Normie book it deactivates their deflector shield. This means that Horsley can get lots of viciously antipathetical home truths about fame and the entertainment industry through readers’ defences without their feeling that they are the victim of a secret authorial agenda to turn them into a tinfoil hat loon.

What Horsley very clearly demonstrates, with numerous facts and anecdotes, is that the movie industry, like the music industry, is and always has been operated by some very evil people and has always been about criminality and propaganda foremost, with entertainment coming a very poor third.

Take The Godfather, rated by many as among Hollywood’s top ten greats. It was financed with mob money - movies being handy for money-laundering because their accounting is so labyrinthine and opaque - and served a number of propaganda purposes. One was humanising ruthless criminal gangs by pretending that, really, it’s all about family - and we can all relate to family. Another, which Horsley doesn’t cover because I don’t think he’s quite far enough down that rabbit hole, was to misdirect attention towards the Italian mob and away from the (probably more dangerous and powerful) Jewish mob, which has called the shots in the US underworld since the days of Meyer Lansky.

You may have seen - perhaps even on my recommendation - The Offer, which was Paramount Plus’s seductive but sanitised take on the making of The Godfather, based on the memoirs of its producer Al Ruddy. The good guys - such as producer Robert Evans - are envy-inducingly cool and glamorous; even the bad guys, such as the mob bosses who supposedly wanted in on the project because they were just little kids at heart thrilled to see themselves on screen, are just lovable rogues. And the goal - in the teeth of resistance from shadowy, Philistine studio executives - is just to hang the expense and try to create as great a piece of art as possible, with the help of crazy genius talents like Marlon Brando and “Marty” Scorsese.

It’s fairytale nonsense of course. Real Hollywood is a shark-eat-shark world of gangsters, predatory paedophiles, Satanic ritual, blood sacrifice, mind-controlled stars and starlets from bloodline families being sexually abused, ripped off and exploited by their ruthless handlers.

Rarely has it displayed its evil more blatantly and vauntingly than in wife-beater, convicted paedophile and probably-much-closer-to-the-Manson-Family-murders-than-he-lets-on Roman Polanski’s 1968 horror ‘classic’ Rosemary’s Baby - in which (alleged) paedophile Woody Allen’s future wife Mia Farrow is drugged and coerced by a friendly-seeming coven in New York’s Dakota Building (where John Lennon was shot, probably by a US intelligence services assassin, who ensured that a mind-controlled patsy called Mark Chapman carried the can) into becoming pregnant with, quite literally, the spawn of the devil. [Sorry if I’ve spoiled the ending for you}.

If you read the preceding paragraph carefully, you may notice one or two clues which might raise the suspicion that there’s something not altogether right about Rosemary’s Baby. Never mind the artistry and the Oscar-winning acting and that killer twist at the end which I’ve ruined for you: this movie is a homage to Satan made by people who, if not in bed with Satan, not all of them anyway, are most definitely on his Christmas card list and would very likely have sat next to him on flights to Little St James had Epstein been in business at the time. If they’d advertised it as “Made by and for the Devil”, they could scarcely have been more blatant about its affiliations.

So how come nobody notices? Because we’ve all been programmed not to notice. We’ve been trained - good doggie - to use phrases like: “Oh c’mon. It’s only a movie.” We’ve been taught that films are primarily there to entertain us. We’ve been encouraged to think of actors’ ‘performances’ as something special which we should admire and maybe discuss afterwards. We’ve learned that if we’re really clever we should be capable of noticing more complicated stuff like lighting or cinematography or even colour palettes. We’ve become emotionally invested in the lives of these people thanks to the chat shows where they ‘reveal’ themselves to be charming, funny and likeable.

These people - the actors, the directors, and, most importantly, the people running them - are pros. They’ve got us looking at all the things they want us to look at. And ignoring all the things they want us to ignore.

And they’ve got us to do it by our own consent, that’s the key. If they had to tell us “Look. Don’t talk about the Satan/gangster/paedo/intelligence services/mind control stuff or we’ll sue you. Or kill you!”, they would have a much harder job. Endless injunctions and assassinations. But nobody, almost nobody, wants to think about the darkest underbelly of the entertainment industry because it’s just not in their interests. What the media wants, partly for the sales and partly because it’s complicit, is not the truth but the access. What the public wants is the dream. It’s not that, on some level or another, we’re any of us unaware that bad stuff goes on. It’s just that we’ve all acquired the mental knack of toning it down or even excusing it. Like: “Yeah, but that’s the Industry. People who go into it know the deal is. It’s always been that way…”

I was part of this lie factory for a while but I honestly didn’t know it was a lie factory. I just delighted to be paid to hang out with famous people, sometimes with foreign travel thrown in, and then write about it afterwards in a way that made both them and me look good. Obviously, if they were really unpleasant - the guy I found most obnoxious was the movie director Michael Mann - I wasn’t going to pull my punches. But what I mean is that I didn’t go into these encounters looking for trouble. I wanted to see the best in these people and take them more or less at their word because I wanted to feel like they were my new friends who would be nice to me if I ever bumped into them again. (Oddly, this did happen with Alan Rickman, whom I saw once or twice afterwards in our favourite clothes shop Margaret Howell). Which is why, for example, I could spend an hour in the company of Tom Hanks - who, I’ve since learned, is just about as loathsome a specimen as Hollywood has ever produced - and come away with the conclusion that he was just about the nicest guy you could ever meet and whom you’d happily trust to babysit your young kids.

But the thing I did even more often than movie star interviews and film reviews was write about rock music. I was a pop critic - and interviewer - for many years, and one of the people I would most have loved to interview, but never did, was Leonard Cohen.

Why Leonard Cohen? Well, obviously, for starters because his music was the sort of thing anyone with pretences to being one of the critical cognoscenti was supposed to like. Which I did - or thought I did - very much. Bird On A Wire, Suzanne, Famous Blue Raincoat and so on seemed to me to be great shagging music, great break up music, great music-to-slit-your-wrists-to music. Probably I would have used terms like ‘plangent’ and ‘melancholy’, which for critics, and rock connoisseurs generally are terms of great approbation. It’s considered a mark of sophistication to appreciate music - usually in minor keys - that makes you feel depressed.

Now that I’m Awake, I find it much harder to decide which of the music classics I like are objectively good, and which I was merely conditioned into thinking were good. But that’s a whole other essay.

Another thing I liked about Cohen is that he was clearly ironic. Clever people, or people who think they are clever, just love ‘irony’ because irony is something that goes over the head of the dumb masses. I now wonder whether the heavy promotion of ‘irony’ as a desirable thing wasn’t devised by sinister people at places like the Tavistock Institute to enable intellectuals to provide cover for the otherwise inexcusable. “Oh Tarantino isn’t actually endorsing and celebrating ultra violence. It’s just his ironic take on it,” etc.

Oh and yes, I’m sure his Jewishness would have appealed to me too. Back then I was under the Loxification spell which teaches us that though we’re all God’s creation and He loves us all, there’s a reason why the Jews are His favourites: they're just that little bit more intelligent, funny, talented. [Discovering that I secretly had Jewish ancestry was another thing I wanted to happen to me when I was younger]

Then, maybe most importantly, Cohen was known to give good interview: wry, amused, deadpan, droll, with lots of famous people from his past - Andy Warhol, Joni Mitchell etc to namecheck - and lots of life and career ups-and-downs to talk about, like the various cover versions of Hallelujah, his venture into synth-pop with Everybody Knows, the stint as a Zen Buddhist monk, and losing all his money to a dodgy accountant which forced him to go on the road once more to try to earn a crust.

But this story, as you may or may not know, has a massive twist. Jasun Horsley has a chapter on it in his book, though I was first alerted to it by this piece, published in January 2015, by Henry Makow.

The twist is this: all along Cohen was an Illuminati secret agent.

Yup. While we were all busy getting warm and gooey about what a charming, ironic, sexy, witty, lovable, talented, hummable, quotable old curmudgeon he was, Leonard Cohen was busy helping engineer our enslavement by the New World Order.

He was born into a bloodlines family that traced its roots back to Babylon. Trained under the MKUltra mind control programme, he first met Jacob Rothschild in 1959 (and went on to hang out with Barbara Hutchinson, Victor Rothschild’s ex-wife on the Greek island of Hydra), happened to be in Havana in Spring 1961 just days before the Bay of Pigs invasion (when he was arrested as a suspected CIA agent) and, as the Makow article puts it, ‘has an impressive record of appearing in distant locations just ahead of historical coups’.

Greece before the Colonels. London for Jimi Hendrix's death. Montreal on the eve of the War Measures Act. Israel just days before the Yom Kippur War broke out in a "surprise attack" by Egypt (September 1973). Asmara, Ethiopia for the CIA and Mossad-backed overthrow of Haile Selassie. Manhattan, when John Lennon died (December 1980).

He even - true to the Illuminati karmic laws: you’ve got to tell them what you’re doing - spells it out in his lyrics.

Field Commander Cohen was our most important spy
Wounded in the line of duty
Parachuting acid into diplomatic cocktail parties.

And what his mission is:

First we take Manhattan, then we take Berlin.

But we all just thought he was being clever and ironic, right?

I don't want to over-explain what ought to be an obvious point. But there’s a reason why the intelligence services term for a secret agent’s deep cover story is the same as the one we often apply to the biggest stars of the movie and music industries: legend.

community logo
Join the James Delingpole Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
1
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Why I Want You on My Website (Not Here)

Subscribing via my website — https://www.jamesdelingpole.co.uk — brings everything together in one place.

You’ll get full, immediate access (at least 24 hours before any other platform) to everything I publish: my articles, as well as my Delingpod, Psalms podcasts - including material that never appears on Substack, Patreon, Locals or anywhere else.

More than that, it gives you a direct line in. You can engage properly - like, save, comment etc - and ask questions that actually get answered.

Most importantly, it supports my ridiculously honest, no-holds-barred independent truth-seeking without relying on evil, big tech, third-party platforms.

If you’re already supporting me here or elsewhere, thank you - it genuinely means a lot. But the best place to do that now is my website.

https://www.jamesdelingpole.co.uk/Support/

00:02:00
A prayer request

Please can you all pray for a miracle with my finger. I’ve had the wire out but unfortunately the bone is refusing to knit. Unless a miracle happens in the next fortnight I’m facing a much bigger, nastier op…. So you’ll see why, on balance, I prefer divine intervention and the more of you that pray the easier you make God’s job.

00:01:04
James and Dick’s CHRISTMAS Special 2025

Featuring Dick. And James. And Unregistered Chicken. And possibly some other special guests.

Not included in ticket price but available so you don’t starve/die of thirst: nice pizzas out of wood-fired ovens; street food.

VIP Tickets - £120 including bell-ringing lesson, walk with James, front row seats, church tour

Location is: My neck of the woods. Northants. Nearest stations, Banbury/Long Buckby. Junction 11 of M40.

Friday, 28th November 2025. Starts at 5pm

https://www.jamesdelingpole.co.uk/Shop/?section=events#events

00:02:47

Posted by Tom Woods this morning. I concur! Breakfast is for farmers.

post photo preview
James's Big Birthday Bash - August 1st. Be There!

Because I love you all and want you to be happy, I’d like few things more than if you were ALL able to join me at my James Delingpole Birthday Bash on August 1st.

Unfortunately, numbers are strictly limited. So please don’t be one of those people - I’m the procrastinating type myself, so I know whereof I speak - who sends me a pleading message a few days before the event saying: “Can you squeeze me in?” Because tragically I might not be able to help.

Here’s why I think you’ll enjoy it. The main event is me doing a live Delingpod with Bob Moran and the conversation is going to be great. You know it is. Apart from my brother Dick - who’ll also be appearing, obvs. - there’s probably no one with whom I have a greater rapport than Bob. And, gosh, do we have a lot to talk about: chemtrails, death jabs, dinosaurs, Satanists, the New World Order etc. All the stuff, basically, that you can’t discuss with your Normie friends, but which here we’ll cover freely and frankly because, hey, you’ll be ...

post photo preview
Christianity 1 New Age 0

If you haven’t already - I’m a bit behind the curve here - I urge you to watch this car crash encounter between Christian apologist and scholar Wes Huff and ‘ancient civilisation’ researcher Billy Carson.

It’s an excruciating experience - probably best to watch it on double speed - for a couple of reasons. First, the hapless podcast host/debate moderator Mark Minard is somewhat out of his depth and is also clearly embarrassed at having one of his guests (Carson, sitting right next to him) eviscerated in front of him by his other guest. This causes him to interrupt the debate at intervals and expound well-meaningly but not very interestingly on his own half-baked views on the mysteries of the universe. You feel a bit sorry for him but you do rather wish he’d shut up.

Second, and mainly, it’s painful to watch Carson being outclassed and outgunned by someone who knows and understands his purported field of expertise so much better than he does. Carson was reportedly so upset by the encounter that he ...

post photo preview
How Not to Lose It at Your Dad's Funeral

“How did you manage to keep it together at your Dad’s funeral?” some sympathetic souls have kindly asked. This was in response to a recent piece I wrote on the experience of delivering my father’s eulogy. I thought, rather than reply individually, that I would turn into it into another article which some of you might find helpful.

  1. Celebrate the life rather than mourn the death

When I was planning my father’s funeral service, my immediate thought was to choose lots of appropriately sad music: Elgar’s ‘Nimrod’; poignant hymns like The Day Thou Gavest, Lord, Is Ended; and so on. Luckily I realised that this would probably be a mistake.

At a funeral, the congregation is already sad enough that someone they love has died. You really don’t need to twist the knife by tormenting them with music guaranteed to reduce them to tears: the tears will flow quite naturally anyway.

So for the intro music, I chose something jaunty: The Dambusters March by Eric Coates. As well as being an affectionate nod to my Dad’s National Service career (when he served in the RAF), it’s a popular, jolly, sturdy tune that puts a smile on your face. This made wheeling the coffin down the aisle much less painful.

You probably need one solemn, slow hymn to acknowledge the gravity of the moment. My father had already settled this by naming Eternal Father, Strong to Save as his chosen hymn in the Death Book we gave him to fill in, at his leisure, while he was still alive and well. (Death Books are very useful. Every elderly person should have one: they’re your last chance to declare how you want to be buried, who you want delivering your eulogy, etc. They also forestall family arguments after you are gone: your wishes having been expressed, the decision already made).

But one depressing hymn is enough. The others should be rousing ones that offer everyone the chance to sing their hearts out and relieve some of that pent up emotion. We agreed on Guide Me O Thou Great Redeemer and Jerusalem. We did wonder whether it was really appropriate to include two such belters. But Gary, the excellent vicar at Christ Church, Malvern, confirmed them as suitable choices. A funeral service, he explained, needs to move in waves: a quiet, contemplative, mournful bit in the middle, book-ended by outbursts of life-affirming, death-conquering exultation.

We played the old man out to the tune of JSB’s Sheep May Safely Graze. I mean, it’s such a classic why would you not?

  1. Keep Your Eyes on the Prize

From the moment I woke up on the day of my father’s funeral, I knew I had but one mission: to give my beloved Daddy the send off he deserved. Just writing that word ‘Daddy’ has brought tears to my eyes, which is why it certainly wasn’t going to be allowed to sneak into my eulogy. My job was not to feel sorry for myself but to deliver an oration worthy of the man.

Also, I’m the eldest sibling. When you are the first born - of five - it’s a job for life. No matter how much your brothers and sisters may subsequently eclipse you in terms of fame, fortune or distinction, whenever you gather together you will always instinctively observe the pecking order you had as children. Therefore, as top dog, you have to set an example. You have to be like a Napoleonic-era naval captain on the quarterdeck of his ship-of-the-line. No matter if there is carnage all around you as your decks are swept with grape, your masts are shattered and your ensign is shredded into a tattered rag. Others may fall but you must keep a cool head.

  1. Pretend It’s Not Happening

Of course, keeping a cool head is easier said than done. But for me it seemed to follow quite naturally from my decision to prioritise my delivery of the eulogy. I entered a kind of trance state in which I felt at one remove from the events around me. When the hearse rolled up with my father’s coffin inside, for example, I quickly fought off thoughts like: “Oh no. That’s my dead Pa in there and he’s not coming back.” Instead, I thought, “Gosh. This is all so intense I’m not even going to try to process it. I’m going to act as if it’s more like a dream.”

It works really well as a strategy, I find. The only problem is afterwards when you realise you haven’t really dealt with any of the emotional issues that might have been alleviated had you allowed yourself to sob and weep. Just now I had a relapse of my various ongoing health problems. Michelle, my wonderful osteo, said my cranial rhythms were so constricted it was as if I were suffering from concussion. She ascribed this - because she had come across it before with other patients - to unresolved grief.

  1. Be a Christian

You should try this sometime, if you haven’t already. Having a strong Christian faith makes SUCH a big difference to how you see death. Not for one second, no not for one fraction of a second, have I imagined that I’m not going to be reunited with my father again at the Resurrection. This is a great comfort to me.

I realise that to an atheist this will seem merely like a delusional cope. But crazy as it may seem, we Christians genuinely believe this stuff. It’s not a position we’ve merely adopted because the Bible tells us so or because we find it to be an agreeable way of dealing with the fact that we’re all gonna die. No. Knowing that there’s an afterlife, that death has been conquered through Christ’s sacrifice, is the essence of everything we think and do. We don’t feel superior to those who think otherwise. Just a bit sorry for them because, goodness, it must be hard living in a world as increasingly demanding as this one and believing that this is all there is.

  1. You Need Dick

Among the qualities I didn’t inherit from my father were a meticulous attention to detail and ability to organise things. Luckily my brother Dick did, which is why things went so smoothly. In military terms, I would be the greenhorn platoon commander desperate to find new ways of getting all his men shot; Dick is the grizzled sergeant who makes sure they don’t.

I had just two jobs - funeral service; eulogy - while Dick took upon himself at least a dozen, from collecting copies of death certificates, informing the various utilities, and booking the church and the grave slot, organising the wake - and the music and photos and sound equipment for our Dick and James tribute - to the tricksy business of dealing with a landlord who, understandably, would much prefer it if the estate went on paying rent for all eternity.

This is the advantage of coming from a large family where there is a range of children with different skill sets. I always knew that having lots of brothers and sisters was a blessing. But I never knew quite how much till my father’s death brought us all together more closely than ever.

So that’s my final piece of advice. If you can and it’s not too late: have lots of children!

Read full Article
post photo preview
How to Deliver the Most Important Speech of Your Life
First, Throw Away Your Script...

I have just delivered the eulogy at my father’s funeral. Was it the most important speech of my life? Well, definitely up there. You only get one shot at giving your old man the send-off he deserves, so you need to get it right.

The temptation on these occasions - and this applies equally to events like daughters’ weddings, best man’s speeches etc - is to make your excuses in advance. “People will understand if I don’t deliver. These occasions are so fraught. You never know how you’re going to react,” you may tell yourself. Sure. But do you really want to spend the rest of your life castigating yourself for how much better you could have been?

You could, of course, play for safety. Type out your speech in advance and read it from a script. This will skirt a lot of potential pitfalls: you can rehearse it so you feel comfortable with it; you’ll have timed it so it won’t overrun; you’ll know you’re not going to say anything clumsy or embarrassing because, perhaps with the help of a trusted adviser, you will have carefully edited it in advance; you (or your paid speechwriter) will have tailored it perfectly with a beginning, middle and an end.

But you will never deliver much more than an average speech. This is first because, unless perhaps done by professional actors, scripted readings never sound as natural or engaging or easy-on-the-ear as unscripted ones. Second because a first-rate speech is a living, breathing thing which responds to the moment. And third because nothing is quite so stimulating to the creative impulse nor thrilling to the nervous system nor makes a speech so exciting to deliver as the terror of going out before an expectant audience and not knowing quite what you are going to say.

Obviously, you’ll need some idea of what you’re going to say. If you don’t know roughly what you want to say you shouldn’t be giving a speech. But this isn’t such a problem as you might think because you do already know what you want to say. What you want to say is the single most important thing that needs to be said about the given topic.

In the case of my father, for example, the important thing was this: he was very special.

But almost every one thinks their Dad is special. What I then had to do was work out what exactly made him so special. Otherwise, I would be in danger of regurgitating a splurge of platitudes and, worse, failing in the one job you have when delivering a funeral oration: capturing the measure of the man (or woman) whose life is being celebrated.

A few ideas came to mind. His bloody mindedness. His pathological aversion to following rules. His insatiable curiosity. His joyous discovery in 1965 when the first of his children was born was that his main purpose in life was to build an empire of Delingpoles.

My father loved being the Delingpole patriarch. (It’s a niche role. There really aren’t many of us). And he liked the idea that rather than preparing his children for the world, it was the world’s job to adapt itself to Delingpoles. Though his five children were all very different, they were very recognisably of the species.

That was my next conundrum. What does a Delingpole look like? I decided they had two defining qualities. One, a very distinctive sense of humour: sometimes warped, often inappropriate, invariably piss-taking. Two, a stubborn determination to be themselves regardless of the personal cost in terms of embarrassment, financial security or ability to gain social acceptance.

Now I had my main theme. I make it sound easy but this is only because I am writing about it after the event. What I haven’t yet mentioned is the hours and hours - and hours - of time I wasted, thrashing about in my head and devising all manner of extraneous verbiage which would end on the cutting room floor.

If I’d read a piece like the one I’m now writing, I could have saved myself an awful lot of trouble. The thing you need to keep in mind when you are constructing a speech is how little time you have to say what needs to be said. So there’s no room - or very little - for anything that is not essential to the main theme.

Oh, and don’t worry about jokes. Or off-the-cuff digressions. Or topical remarks. These will all occur to you naturally in the moment, once you’ve had a chance to assess your audience and the general mood. They don’t need to be worked up in advance: indeed they shouldn’t be because then they turn into darlings. And the only thing to do with darlings, you may remember, is to kill them.

With speeches - as with essays - you won’t go far wrong if you stick to the old, basic, tripartite structural rule:

First, say what you are going to say; then say it; then say what you have just said.

Rules are made to be broken, as we’ll see in a moment. But that one keeps you honest and focused on the task in hand, viz, not skittering around like a crazed dog looking for more exciting new ideas to cram in, but finding ways to amplify your main point so as to enable your audience more fully to appreciate it.

Remember, unlike you, your audience haven’t been living with this speech for the last umpteen weeks. This is their first exposure to it. So what may seem to you like overkill may to them feel more like light understatement bordering on incomprehensibility.

And given that your audience are mainly the people on whom the success of your speech stands or falls, you want them onside. This means not just giving them a line of argument they can clearly follow - even if they are elderly and half deaf, which is not uncommon among funeral congregations - but also making them feel wanted and part of the occasion.

That’s why, early on in my address - but not before I’d got over The Hump - I told everyone present that they were part of the family. “Today you are all honorary Delingpoles”, I said. And I meant it because the fact that they’d all turned out to say goodbye to my father on the hottest day of the year told me all I needed to know: that all of these people were discerning enough to have recognised something special in my father; likely he felt the same way about them. It’s worth remembering that at funerals when you’re not close family you can feel a bit of an imposter. “Should I really be here among so much private grief?” you wonder. A quick acknowledgement from the lectern is a reassuring thing to hear.

Now you’re wondering what The Hump is. This is the name given by my old - and now sadly deceased - friend Brian Robinson for the nasty part at the beginning of a speech which you always dread and somehow have to get past. Once you’ve over The Hump, you’re cooking with gas. And The Hump itself need not be a problem, Brian (a former actor turned professional speech coach) advised. You just need to acknowledge its existence and tackle it head on by preparing for it and dealing with it rather than ignoring it and hoping it will go away.

My biggest challenge, I decided, would be to find an anecdote which simultaneously grabbed the audience’s attention, set the tone of the eulogy (affectionate, amused, upbeat, funny not sad) and didn’t outstay its welcome.

On these occasions - seriously: try it! - I find that appealing to God makes all the difference. I prayed for His help in delivering a eulogy worthy of my father. And God came up trumps by supplying me with the perfect anecdote.

It went roughly like this.

“The first time I realised my father was different was 52 years ago when I was sent off to board at a prep school only about half a mile from where we are now. All the other eight year olds knew how to kick a football, pass a rugger ball and catch a cricket ball. I could do none of the above because my father had never shown me. But I was the only boy who knew the Latin name for the common European wall lizard.”

The reason it works is because it’s funny (well I think so), it hints at the theme which will be enlarged on in the body of the eulogy, it makes a geographical connection with both the location and the audience, it doesn’t last more than a minute, it’s easy to remember (as deep-seated personal recollections always are) and it ends with a clearly defined punchline.

But you’re still not over The Hump just yet. First you must make the transition from your grabby intro to the speech proper. This isn’t easy because you’ve likely paused to allow the audience to appreciate the punchline of your opening anecdote, giving them a chance to laugh as they’ve probably been gagging to do because funerals can be so tense. So how do you do this?

Well the solution I came up with, more or less on the spot because at this point I was letting nervous energy and divine providence take care of the heavy lifting, was to acknowledge what an awesome privilege but also a terrifying responsibility it was to be the one who has to deliver your father’s eulogy. I then observed how very much my father would have disapproved of my trying to do it without any notes, it being such a huge risk to take at an occasion so important - and surely, I ought at least to have a safety net ready just in case.

“But it’s your fault, Pa,” I said. “You bred us this way!” Which is true. He did. He never stopped trying to give us advice on the courses we should take in life but we never ever listened to him and I think he took pride in our utter obliviousness to his wishes. It was a sign that we were the free spirits that he wanted us to be and hoped we would be.

From that point on it was almost plain sailing. All we needed now was a pay off: something to reward the audience for their patience and give them the sense of a speech satisfyingly concluded; but also, more importantly, something that left you with the feeling: “Yes. This was truly special man we’ve just been celebrating. And we’re all going to miss him greatly.”

I decided to break the “Say what you’re going to say; say it; say what you have just said” rule by introducing a sub theme. This was because I had belatedly realised that I had something else very important I needed to say about my father. It had only occurred to me in the weeks after his death when my head was suddenly awash with memories of him and I was trying to make sense of them, trying to work out who he really was. You think you know your father when he is alive but you don’t because you are too busy taking him for granted. Only when he has gone do you start asking yourself: “Who actually was this person whom I’ve now irretrievably lost?” When he’s alive he’s your dad and this relationship colours everything you think about him. But when he’s gone you find yourself trying to understand the world as it might have been from his perspective instead of from yours.

What stood out for me was what a blinder he had played with the cards he’d been dealt in life. Anyone - well, almost anyone: probably not my father who was never much cop at bridge - can win a hand when they’re holding all the Kings and Aces. But it’s how you play the average hands or the shitty hands that are the truer mark of character. Though my old man was born to a life of relative privilege - it was neither easy nor conventionally successful. He suffered bouts of depression; he was cruelly cut out of his father’s will; his first two marriages ended in divorce; his business ventures failed; he had never wanted the career that was forced on him by his father and would have been much happier, probably, as an academic or some kind of maverick, independent researcher or author. Yet no one in that church would have considered him a failure for one second. Because he wasn’t. On the contrary, he repeatedly turned what could have been disaster into triumph by resolutely focusing on the main prize.

And what was this main prize? Hard to define, exactly, but we all had a sense of it in our hearts because it was why we were all there celebrating the life of a man who in his various ways had meant so much to us. As I wrote in my Spectator tribute - which, rather sweetly, the undertaker Georgia placed in his coffin so he could digest it at leisure - I grew almost weary of being told by people who had met him what delightful company my father was. He was both interesting (RAF Chinese language specialist; racing driver; guppy breeder; reptile and amphibian collector; inveterate traveller; etc) and interested, always curious in other people, always wanting to find out more. That’s why on his gravestone, we shall be inscribing one of his favourite catchphrases: “What else do you know?” His desire for new information was insatiable.

This led naturally to my conclusion. I quoted the epitaph on Sir Christopher Wren’s tomb. A bit of a cliche, but apposite. Si monumentum requiris, circumspice. Wren’s epitaph referred to his greatest creation, St Paul’s Cathedral. My father’s to the place he occupied in the memories of all those people - perhaps 150, not bad for a 91-year old who’d outlived all his friends - who’d come to the church to see him off.

Goodbye Pa. We’re going to miss you terribly. But you’re going to live on in all sorts of ways that you could never have imagined. This piece, for example. Someone, somewhere is going to find it useful or comforting or even inspirational. And it’s you they should thank for that, not me.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Don't Feed The Demons!

The other day someone wrote something infuriating on the internet which required an angry rebuttal. This happens to me quite a lot, as I suspect it does to you. I had many pressing things to do that morning which demanded my attention - a tribute to write for the Spectator about the death of my beloved, favourite hunter Carpenter; arrangements to make for my father’s funeral; and any number of urgent gardening tasks to fulfil in order to keep my wife happy.

But really this angry rebuttal could not wait. So, poisoned keyboard at the ready, I set about my work. The problem was that no matter how hard I tried, I could never strike a sufficiently satisfying note. I tried cattily sarcastic; then loftily superior; then cool, restrained but implacable; then charming and conciliatory but not really. Numerous drafts and far too many minutes later, I was still no closer to my goal - probably because I wanted to achieve too many contradictory effects simultaneously. On the one hand I wanted to crush, humiliate, mock and destroy. On the other I wanted to set the facts straight in such a way as to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that The Truth was on my side. I also wanted to show myself to be the better person: the good guy in this ugly feud with whom everyone reading it should identify.

https://www.jamesdelingpole.co.uk/Writing/Articles/why-we-can-t-all-get-along?preview=1

Then suddenly I realised - “****!” - I’d just missed the first fifteen minutes of my gym class. So carried away had I been my righteous desire for vengeance over something ineffably trivial and forgettable that I had stopped myself doing something that was actually good for me; something I had been looking forward to all morning; something far more valuable and life enhancing than getting involved in yet another silly, pointless, worthless row with some nonentity.

At times like this, I’m reminded of the words of David in Psalm 37.

Leave off from wrath; and let go displeasure; fret not thyself else thou shalt be moved to do evil.

Nothing useful would have been achieved had I responded to the person who had irked me. However cunningly I had phrased myself, they would have still taken umbrage and would have been confirmed in their view that I’m loathsome, arrogant, entitled, petulant, controlled opposition, closet MI5 etc.

This is because many - though not all - of the people who have a go at you on social media are not doing so in good faith. They’ve already made up their mind what they think about you. At this point, even if you were to walk towards them across a lake, heal their genital warts and transform all their bottles of Tesco plonk into Chateau Cheval Blanc ‘47, they’d still have you down as an obvious Wrong ‘Un.

Again, the scriptures have some invaluable words to say on this subject.

And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.

Yes, specifically this is Jesus - in Matthew 10:14 - advising His disciples how best to spread the gospel. But like so much in the Bible - which I consider to be an instruction manual on how to navigate a fallen world - it carries many broader, practical implications.

Nobody is universally liked. Not even Jesus. (Indeed, especially not Jesus). So there’s no point trying to win battles with the people who hate you because all it does is leech away the valuable time you’d be better off spending on the people who like you and are receptive to your message.

I’ve written already about the destructive spats which have arisen of late in the Awake Not-a-Community. No doubt they feel incredibly important to the people participating in them. But the majority - I suspect, the vast majority - of Awake types are thinking: “What IS this crazy shit? Why do we have to take sides in this argument that is being thrust in our face like it’s the Wars of the Roses and we have to declare for the Yorkists or the Lancastrians on pain of death? Why can’t we just have another podcast or post where we learn something useful about the real baddies we’re facing in this epic struggle between good and evil, either that or one that’s fun and where can at least have a laugh?”

So it’s to this majority that in future I shall try to direct my energies. Note that word ‘try’, because I doubt very much I will always succeed. The problem with these little hate-fests is that they are so incredibly seductive. We all need our dopamine hits - the Cabal have trained us to do this by giving us iPhones and social media and so on - and just as the Normies have their kickyball to get them all worked up, distracted and controlled, so we in Awake world have our periodic witch-hunts and bouts of purity spiralling and hanging-drawing-and-quarterings.

And sometimes it’s FUN being bitchy and spiteful and appearing to win. I look at some of Milo’s ripostes on Twitter and think: “Go Milo! You so totally OWNED that awful person!” Owen Benjamin, another character I admire, is pretty good at this stuff too. But it requires a lot of dedication and effort. You have to be perpetually on it if you want to keep the whole swarm of those pesky mosquitos continually swatted. And what I’m wondering is: is it really worth the time and energy?

What I also wonder - hence the title of this piece - is: “And isn’t it just feeding the demons?” Whenever I’m tempted to pile into one of these spats, I hear a voice in my head going: “But what’s the point of reciting Psalm 37 every day if you’re going to treat it like empty words which you can casually ignore?” Then I hear the counter argument in my head which goes something like: “Oh come on! You’re allowed a bit of leeway. Spiking people who deserve it is satisfying and fun. Your fans love it because it shows you being witty and on-brand. You’re not a monk, for goodness sake. You’re a high class edge lord.”

I trust the first voice, though, more than I do the second. What I know about demons - which I believe are totally real, of course - is that they feed off negative energy. They love generating rows and they have several millennias’ worth of experience to show them exactly which buttons to press in order to achieve the desired effect. If they can lure you into the fray by saying “Hey - it’s naughty but you’re good at it and you know you love it!” then that’s the bait they’ll use. But they’re equally adept at appealing to what you think is your better nature, viz: “My motives are pure. I am a selfless servant of the truth and it matters not how many people I upset nor how much glorious martyrdom I suffer at the hands of those doubters who think I have gone too far, for I am the paladin of justice and right is on my side.”

Of course, having made this argument I recognise I have now made myself an open target for those mosquito swarms. “Yeah but last month you said this…!” or “But you’re always accusing people of being Controlled Opposition.” True but - re-read the piece, moron! [sorry God] - I never said I was a saint. I do aspire to be one, for that is the Christian ideal, but being a sinner I fail more often than I succeed. That’s one of the reasons I have to write pieces like this one. I need to remind myself, and anyone else who will listen, that this spiritual battle we are fighting ought to be front and centre of everything that we do and think; and that the moral and behavioural restraints that Christianity seeks to impose on us are not there (as the devil would pretend) to turn us into sanctimonious prigs in thrall to a capricious sky fairy. Rather, these restraints are there to help us and protect us and make us better.

That is what I meant earlier when I talked about the Bible being a practical survival guide. It’s an advice manual full of tips that really work in day-to-day life. As an example of this let me tell you what happened recently after someone really had a go at me in the comments on Substack. He called me out as a liar, a fraud, a ‘Chaos Agent’, implied I was only using scripture to give myself a kind of fake ethical legitimacy, that I was making a mockery of my audience, etc etc. It could have been quite hurtful. Actually, it was quite hurtful - especially coming from someone whose intelligence and scholarship I admired, and with whom I’d hitherto had friendly dealings on my podcast.

So, naturally enough, my immediate urge was for dire vengeance. In my feverish, injustice-traumatised brain I began working on the perfect killer riposte.

Then I thought. “Wait a second. Those demons really are desperate for your attention and you’re in strong danger of giving it to them. Surely there is a better way?”

And there was. Listen to my latest podcast with Robert Frederick (aka Hidden Life Is Best). I think you’ll love it because it’s really, really good. But it would never have happened if I’d fed those demons.

https://locals.com/jamesdelingpole/feed?post=8012229

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals