How You Know What Is REALLY Going On With Israel/Gaza (pt 2)
One of the things I’ve noticed on my Awakening journey is that the historical events most imprinted on our consciousness are often the ones most factually suspect. It’s the history equivalent of Miri AF’s “If you know their name they’re in the game.” That is, there’s a reason why we ‘Remember, remember the Fifth of November’ [in Britain at any rate: this commemorates the psyop in which a Catholic Guido Fawkes was falsely accused of trying to blow up Parliament], why the Titanic sinking was commemorated by a film called ‘A Night to Remember’, why we’ve all been encouraged to remember exactly where we were when we heard the news that Kennedy was shot or that the first plane had hit the Twin Towers: it’s because They made damn sure you couldn’t not remember it.
It’s terrifying but also not a little exhilarating when you realise that what you used to think of as ‘history’ is in fact just a succession of stage managed events created for the amusement, enrichment and empowerment of a handful of psychopaths. The exhilaration part is the sense of relief and excitement which comes from knowing you are no longer the hapless prisoner of someone else’s fake narrative: you are free, finally to think for yourself, and see the world as it really is.
At least that has been my own experience. But not everyone on the Awakening journey, I’ve noticed, is quite so eager to go all the way. Rather than face the ultimate truth that this IS a millennia-old spiritual war between good and evil, one or two of my comrades cop out by taking what I call the ‘purple-pilled’ option. That is, they insist on keeping at least one foot in the old paradigm in order to demonstrate to themselves and their old friends that they haven’t completely lost the plot.
On the subject of ‘conspiracy theories’, for example, this tendency manifests itself in a form of ostentatious, overzealous scepticism. I mean the sort of people who want ‘receipts’ for everything; who are dismissive of anything that strikes them as too outlandish - ‘flat earth’, say, or ‘terrain theory’, or Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs), or ‘false flags’ - because it ‘discredits our cause.’
Of course, I understand that the impulse behind this tendency is a well-intentioned one: its emphasis on the importance of rigour and hard evidence; its desire to prove ourselves to be better, more trustworthy, more consistently sceptical than the purblind dupes of the Matrix system whose credulity we so regularly deride.
But there’s a flaw with this approach. It presupposes that the information we seek in order to confirm our suspicions is readily available, that - for example - if only we look hard enough, we’re going to find the signed mission directive from the US military’s Space Force giving orders for the deployment of DEWs over Maui, plus, perhaps, various emails to privileged landowners like Oprah Winfrey warning them to make sure the tiles on their roofs are painted blue.
The likelihood is, though, that this evidence will not be available. That is the nature of the asymmetrical war we are fighting. Our enemies have at their disposal almost unimaginably powerful tools of disinformation and deception. They control the media, the entertainment industry, the technology companies, the military - and, also, of course, the entirety of the world’s intelligence apparatus. When they plan these operations they leave nothing to chance. They’re hardly going to leave us the kind of clues that would properly enable us to expose their schemes.
Like Mr Wolf in Pulp Fiction, they are masters of the clean up. And masters of other tricks too, like the one where they deliberately plant information which seems to support our case, but which they then use to pull the rug from under us by revealing it to be a hoax and casting doubt on everything else we claim. This was the purpose of discredited witness Carl Beech in the UK government’s child sex abuse enquiry: “Here is a man claiming to be a victim of sexual abuse by the rich and powerful. But his claims are fraudulent. Therefore all people who claim to have been victims of sexual abuse by the rich and powerful are fraudulent.” Another example of this, in the early days of the Israel psyop, was the release of fake news that Israel had bombed and destroyed the world’s third-oldest church.
So how do we negotiate this Hall of Mirrors, where reality is distorted, and where no one can be fully trusted for fear that they might be a double agent, a Judas goat, controlled opposition or a gatekeeper working either deliberately or inadvertently for the enemy? How can we ever hope to discover the truth in a world where the entire system is designed to keep us in the dark?
Well there used to be a popular phrase, which you don’t hear so often these days, “He can’t see the wood for the trees.” That is, if you focus too exclusively on detail, you tend to lose sight of the bigger picture. I think the people behind psyops like the current one in Israel are very aware of this. Indeed, I’d argue that it lies at the root of their strategy. Notice how the thing we’re being encouraged to do above all else in response to those media reports is to focus on detail: the body parts, the personal tragedies, the gore, the part-blurred photographs. Almost never are we allowed space to consider the wider context, for that would give too much play to our intellect rather than our emotions.
I observed similar techniques used in the ten years or so I spent fighting the climate wars. Every day the climate alarmists bombard us with emotive images: floods, wildfires, airport thermometers showing record temperatures, lonely polar bears, cracked earth. It’s that conjuror at work, again: he needs you to focus on his misdirections because otherwise you’d see through his trick.
Indeed, now I think about it, it’s the method they use for ALL their psyops: Mohammed Atta’s evil staring eyes; the miraculously unburned passport; the dead little boy washed up on the beach; President Nixon on his phone call to outer space; Nigel Farage banging pots and pans for our NHS; more massacre victims of the evil Russians in Ukraine; etc.
This calls to my mind something my first driving instructor told me. He was a laid back person called Paul, quite unsuited to being a driving instructor because he was so laissez-faire. But he did once give me a tip, which clearly I’ve never forgotten, on how to negotiate your way through tight gaps - say, those metal barriers guarding the entrance to some London streets which always make you fear you’re going to get your wing mirror pulled off or your side panels scratched. He told me not to focus on the obstacles (such as those scary upright metal poles) but rather to see the picture ahead as a whole. It would help, he suggested, if I squinted so as not to get distracted by the detail. He’d got this tip from a movie about gunfighters in the Wild West, one about Annie Oakley, possibly.
Maybe too much detail is part of our problem. Maybe this is one of the reasons so many people fall for the latest thing, even people who should know better like the Awake types who saw through the Covid psyop, the climate change psyop, and the Ukraine psyop but have yet fallen hook line and sinker for the “Hamas are the most dangerous and evil threat in the world and only the annihilation of Gaza followed by war with Iran can possibly make amends for all those babies they killed” psyop. We’ve been encouraged, culturally, to believe that details are the key to understanding everything; that to be a ‘details man’ is a desirable quality. But what if actually that’s just another way of distracting us from the bigger picture? What if it’s another part of the trap?
